Every case the journal cites, oldest first, with what it held and the entries that discuss it.
Shankari Prasad, 1951
A constitutional amendment is made under constituent power, not legislative power, so Article 13 does not touch it. The First Amendment survived.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine · Article 368 on one page
Berubari Union, 1960
The Preamble is not a part of the Constitution and confers no substantive power. The first half was reversed in Kesavananda Bharati, 1973.
Discussed in The Preamble as a key
Sajjan Singh, 1965
The same answer as Shankari Prasad, but two judges recorded doubts.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine
Golaknath, 1967
Reversed, by 6:5: an amendment is law for the purposes of Article 13, so Parliament cannot abridge fundamental rights at all. Prospective effect only.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine · Article 368 on one page
Kesavananda Bharati, 1973
Thirteen judges, eleven opinions, 7:6. The amending power under Article 368 is wide but cannot damage the basic structure; Golaknath overruled. The Preamble is a part of the Constitution and amendable.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine · Article 368 on one page · The Preamble as a key
Indira Nehru Gandhi, 1975
Free and fair elections are part of the basic structure.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine
Minerva Mills, 1980
Clauses 4 and 5 of Article 368, inserted by the 42nd Amendment, struck down: a limited amending power is itself part of the basic structure, as is the balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine · Article 368 on one page
Waman Rao, 1981
The basic structure doctrine applies to laws made after 24 April 1973.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine
S. R. Bommai, 1994
Federalism and secularism are part of the basic structure.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine
I. R. Coelho, 2007
Laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after 24 April 1973 are open to judicial review.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine
NJAC judgment, 2015
Independence of the judiciary is part of the basic structure.
Discussed in The Basic Structure Doctrine
Puttaswamy (Aadhaar), 2018
TODO: what it held. The journal records only that Rojer Mathew, 2019, doubted whether it applied the Money Bill test correctly.
Discussed in Who decides what a Money Bill is
Rojer Mathew, 2019
A five-judge bench doubted whether Puttaswamy (Aadhaar), 2018, had applied the Money Bill test correctly and referred the question to a larger bench.
Discussed in Who decides what a Money Bill is